Sponsors
Click for Mortgage and Loans Info
Current Newsletter Newsletter Archives
blah blah
Go Back   MakeupTalk > Announcements - Introductions > General Chit Chat - off topic talk
User Name
Password

Abbreviations Rules/Regs
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2004, 11:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
Millennium Talker
 
Californian's Avatar
Californian's Notepad
Californian's Reviews
Californian's Swaps
User has 2,204 Posts

Join Date: Feb 2004
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lightbulb Destroying Potential WMD

Because of recently unearthed info. like this, I think people will reelect Bush. There's always more going on than we can know.Take a look:



<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>US reveals Iraq nuclear operation


</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>Click the image to open in full size. Abraham called the operation a "major achievement"

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.

"This operation was a major achievement," said US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham in a statement.

He said it would keep "potentially dangerous nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists".

Along with 1.77 tons of enriched uranium, about 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" were also removed.

The material was taken from a former nuclear research facility on 23 June, after being packaged by 20 experts from the US Energy Department's secret laboratories.

It was flown out of the country aboard a military plane in a joint operation with the Department of Defense, and is being stored temporarily at a DOD facility.

The United Nations nuclear watchdog - the International Atomic Energy Agency - and Iraqi officials were informed ahead of the operation, which happened ahead of the 28 June handover of sovereignty.

'Dirty bomb'?

The explosion of a so-called "dirty bomb" in a city by a terrorist group is a major concern of Western intelligence agencies.

Rather than causing a nuclear explosion, a "dirty bomb" would see radioactive material combined with a conventional explosive - probably causing widespread panic and requiring a large clean-up operation.

<!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>Click the image to open in full size. Iraq's biggest nuclear complex was the Tuwaitha site south of Baghdad

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->

Uranium would not be suitable for fashioning such a device, though appropriate material may have been among the other unidentified "sources".

Mr Abraham added that the operation had also prevented the material falling into the hands "of countries that may seek to develop their own nuclear weapons".

The 1,000 "sources" evacuated in the Iraqi operation included a "huge range" of radioactive items used for medical purposes and industrial purposes, a spokesman for the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration told AP news agency. Bryan Wilkes said much of the material was "in powdered form, which is easily dispersed". The IAEA has been among organisations which have warned that many countries have lost track of radioactive material.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Source
Californian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote To THE TOP!
Old 07-07-2004, 07:34 AM   #2 (permalink)
.·´¯`²ºº8~admin~²ºº8´¯`·.
 
Tony-admin's Avatar
Tony-admin's Notepad
Tony-admin's Reviews
Tony-admin's Swaps
Tony-admin's Friends

User has 17,239 Posts
country flag United_States
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SOCAL Bro
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 38
Thanked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Thank you for this post. But will Susan Sarandon or Tim Robbins or Micheal Moore find this post?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Californian
Because of recently unearthed info. like this, I think people will reelect Bush. There's always more going on than we can know.Take a look:



<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>US reveals Iraq nuclear operation




</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>Click the image to open in full size. Abraham called the operation a "major achievement"



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.


"This operation was a major achievement," said US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham in a statement.

He said it would keep "potentially dangerous nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists".

Along with 1.77 tons of enriched uranium, about 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" were also removed.

The material was taken from a former nuclear research facility on 23 June, after being packaged by 20 experts from the US Energy Department's secret laboratories.

It was flown out of the country aboard a military plane in a joint operation with the Department of Defense, and is being stored temporarily at a DOD facility.

The United Nations nuclear watchdog - the International Atomic Energy Agency - and Iraqi officials were informed ahead of the operation, which happened ahead of the 28 June handover of sovereignty.

'Dirty bomb'?

The explosion of a so-called "dirty bomb" in a city by a terrorist group is a major concern of Western intelligence agencies.

Rather than causing a nuclear explosion, a "dirty bomb" would see radioactive material combined with a conventional explosive - probably causing widespread panic and requiring a large clean-up operation.

<!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>Click the image to open in full size. Iraq's biggest nuclear complex was the Tuwaitha site south of Baghdad



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->

Uranium would not be suitable for fashioning such a device, though appropriate material may have been among the other unidentified "sources".

Mr Abraham added that the operation had also prevented the material falling into the hands "of countries that may seek to develop their own nuclear weapons".

The 1,000 "sources" evacuated in the Iraqi operation included a "huge range" of radioactive items used for medical purposes and industrial purposes, a spokesman for the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration told AP news agency. Bryan Wilkes said much of the material was "in powdered form, which is easily dispersed". The IAEA has been among organisations which have warned that many countries have lost track of radioactive material.


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Source
__________________
Please Visit

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Please note I don't answer support questions via e-mail or PM - please use the relevant thread or forumxxx
Tony-admin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote To THE TOP!
Old 07-08-2004, 07:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
.·´¯`²ºº8~admin~²ºº8´¯`·.
 
Tony-admin's Avatar
Tony-admin's Notepad
Tony-admin's Reviews
Tony-admin's Swaps
Tony-admin's Friends

User has 17,239 Posts
country flag United_States
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SOCAL Bro
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 38
Thanked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Yup, your right. It's a shame isn't it?



Quote:
Originally Posted by naturally
Come on ...even if you walked them personally right to the WMD's ..they'd say "Nope ..you're all wrong ..there aren't any!" This was all over nothing ...should have never gotten started ..blah blah blah.

The naysayers will never get it ...plain and simple! What ..even that thimble full of Ricin (sp) can kill something like 105,000 people ..isn't that a Mass of people? My god Saddamm had how many years to hide the stuff with the likes of Clinton telling him he better get rid of them or else!

GO BUSH!
Tony-admin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote To THE TOP!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Home - Product Review Center - Swaps - Member Market Place - Member Center - Search Reviews - Search Swaps
User Control Panel - Links - Link To Us - Advertise - Rules - Media - Help - SiteMap

Powered by: MakeupTalk, Inc. 3.7.4 Copyright ©2003 - 2008, AR WebSolutions, Inc
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Page generated in 0.33175 seconds with 17 queries

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73