[ColdDayInHell]

Actress Natasha Richardson revealed rather too much as she flashed her nude-coloured underwear at last night's Costume Institute Gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York. In an attempt to ensure she didn't embarrass herself by tripping up as she ascended the stairs in her high heels, Natasha came a cropper anyway.


Former model Stephanie Seymour's sheer gown revealed her nipple cover and a lot of leg on the red carpet


Actress Eva Mendes green structured gown parts in the front to reveal plenty of thigh.

Source

[Anthea]

The nipple covers are just too much lol

[Duchess Ravenwaves]

Good thing Natasha Richardson was wearing panties. Otherwise we would have gotton a real peep show

[Jennyjean]

I love the dress Eva Mendes is wearing!

[pinksugar]

oops Stephanie looks gorgeous, it's a shame that her nipple covers showed through! (better than the nipples themselves I guess!)

[speedy]

Oops.

[katana]

I think I feel worst for Natasha Richardson!

[kdmakeuparts]

unfortunate, since they all looked so bautiful.

[magosienne]

yuck.

[magneticheart]

Why would you wear a sheer dress anyway? Lol! Natasha Richardson actually looks okay it it weren't for the pant flashing.

[Adrienne]

I can't imagine it'd be that difficult to choose a dress that actually covered the body parts that should be covered.

[reesesilverstar]

Relly tho?

Paparazzi, I just don't get them at all

[Karren]

LOL I didn't even know they made nipple covers!!

[Darla]

Originally Posted by Adrienne

I can't imagine it'd be that difficult to choose a dress that actually covered the body parts that should be covered.

i think Adrienne summed it up pretty well.

[~Ms.August~365]

Poor Stephanie Seymour... where are these people's FRIENDS at when they get ready to walk out the door?!?! The dress is sheer up top... see through!!! Were the nipples covers just to make her feel better?