Originally Posted by Sexy Sadie
I actually have nothing against animal testing, because what is the alternative?
Well, let me tell you, the foreskin of new born babies. Yes, that is correct.In the US; Hospitals sells the foreskin of butchered babyboys to cosmetic companies for testing and science, so they can tell us the consumers that they do not test on animals. But this is better=?
I know this is old, but it seems to not have a definite answer, either way.
And are you serious, that you see no difference in using dead flesh, as opposed to a living animal? Really? Are you an idiot?
I dont agree with cutting the foreskin off, but if some parents wanna do it, thats their business, and better that skin be used for something, that ending up as medical waste.
If you think using an animal is better that using dead skin, theres something wrong with you.