Kristine Walker
Her Nibs
Ordered the Life Career palette last night. No more buying until Christmas!
Sure, sure! Keep telling yourself that. /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" /> LOLOriginally Posted by Kristine Walker /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Ordered the Life Career palette last night. No more buying until Christmas!
Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Quote: Originally Posted by Kristine Walker /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Ordered the Life Career palette last night. No more buying until Christmas!
Sure, sure! Keep telling yourself that. /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" /> LOL
Not cool at all. I think the whole concept of "our sisterhood" should probably be worked on further though, the launch of it seems a bit pre-mature.Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Found COPPA violations on the EM Cosmetics site. To me this means that the site does not have an age check. Granted there are ways to get around it since technically those kids shouldn't even have email addresses however L'Oreal is at fault for not designing the site to have an age check and with minor profiles - who names, ages, location AND email addresses are visible to everyone - they are in violation of COPPA. I've emailed both the L'Oreal and Lancome public relations ladies a couple of days ago when I noticed that people's email addresses are exposed so they ARE aware of the situation and so far nothing has been done to correct the email issue being revealed. To me the smartest thing is to remove the "Our Sisterhood" until it's corrected AND minor profiles are not shown (period) and those under the age of 13 are removed.
Wow, it's totally mind blowing to me that they wouldn't take care of this situation right away. Privacy is such a big issue nowadays. You would think that this shouldn't have been a problem in the first place. It seems like such a basic concept to not reveal people's information like that.Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The "Our Sisterhood" portion of the site is really bothering me. Not too long ago (last month or the month before) a young girl was raped after a convicted sex offender moved into our area to be with her. Apparently they began to correspond via email and eventually he moved here to rape her! To me the "Our Sisterhood" portion of the EM site showing people's email addresses, ages, names (and in many cases FULL names) and location just screams privacy violation since you don't know that your email address is used to create a public profile. Yes you can set the profile to private but unless you do by default it appears to be public. I was able to find Cookie's profile even though she has it set to private.
I've emailed Michelle's public relations lady at Lancome and L'Oreal twice already (since Thursday), I've emailed EM Cosmetics three times, I've posted it on FB, on Twitter and no one has looked into it yet. To me this is something that needs to be fixed NOW not Monday, not eventually but NOW.
Considering I'm able to view 11, 12 and 13 year old girls accounts makes me wonder how much of a violation this is for L'Oreal as THEY own the site not Michelle. This is why she can't be blamed for this because she's not the owner of the domain.
I looked at my profile again, they don't have my mailing address and they certainly won't ever have it, and I will NOT be ordering anything from them until my email address isn't being shown.Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The "Our Sisterhood" portion of the site is really bothering me. Not too long ago (last month or the month before) a young girl was raped after a convicted sex offender moved into our area to be with her. Apparently they began to correspond via email and eventually he moved here to rape her! To me the "Our Sisterhood" portion of the EM site showing people's email addresses, ages, names (and in many cases FULL names) and location just screams privacy violation since you don't know that your email address is used to create a public profile. Yes you can set the profile to private but unless you do by default it appears to be public. I was able to find Cookie's profile even though she has it set to private.
I've emailed Michelle's public relations lady at Lancome and L'Oreal twice already (since Thursday), I've emailed EM Cosmetics three times, I've posted it on FB, on Twitter and no one has looked into it yet. To me this is something that needs to be fixed NOW not Monday, not eventually but NOW.
Considering I'm able to view 11, 12 and 13 year old girls accounts makes me wonder how much of a violation this is for L'Oreal as THEY own the site not Michelle. This is why she can't be blamed for this because she's not the owner of the domain.
Originally Posted by CheshireCookie /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Quote: Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The "Our Sisterhood" portion of the site is really bothering me. Not too long ago (last month or the month before) a young girl was raped after a convicted sex offender moved into our area to be with her. Apparently they began to correspond via email and eventually he moved here to rape her! To me the "Our Sisterhood" portion of the EM site showing people's email addresses, ages, names (and in many cases FULL names) and location just screams privacy violation since you don't know that your email address is used to create a public profile. Yes you can set the profile to private but unless you do by default it appears to be public. I was able to find Cookie's profile even though she has it set to private.
I've emailed Michelle's public relations lady at Lancome and L'Oreal twice already (since Thursday), I've emailed EM Cosmetics three times, I've posted it on FB, on Twitter and no one has looked into it yet. To me this is something that needs to be fixed NOW not Monday, not eventually but NOW.
Considering I'm able to view 11, 12 and 13 year old girls accounts makes me wonder how much of a violation this is for L'Oreal as THEY own the site not Michelle. This is why she can't be blamed for this because she's not the owner of the domain.
I looked at my profile again, they don't have my mailing address and they certainly won't ever have it, and I will NOT be ordering anything from them until my email address isn't being shown.If it doesn't change soon, I WILL be writing a very firm and possibly not so pleasant letter or email stating that they remove my profile completely as I can't see any way to do so myself. Zadi have you heard of any way to do that yet? All I can see to do is make it private and we see how well that helps.
Oh this sucks! This needs to be taken care of ASAP! I cannot believe L'Oreal/Lancome would be dumb enough to let children sign up and put email addresses in that are displayed in a public forum. This is such a ridiculously simple issue, other sites with far less of a budget have managed it.
Ugh. Ridiculous.
I'm interested I'm reading your reviews of the items you purchased. However, at this point the products would have to be amazing for me to even consider buying anything and even then I don't think I would actually buy anything.Ok, so here is what I ordered to review: 1. The Life Palette in Night Life - felt this palette had a nice mix of neutrals, color, and variety in the lip colors. Since the lip color formulas in the palettes are same as those in the tubes, I figured this would be a good way to review the lip products as well as the eye shadows. 2. The Great Cover Up Concealer - Michelle always seems all about the concealer so I was curious to see how hers performs. 3. Dramatic Volume Waterproof Mascara - this is a $20 mascara which is pretty pricey. I want to see if it's worth this price point. 4. The Waterliner - my Ipsy promo code worked, so I got this for free.
It's the only way I'd ever be able to afford it!Originally Posted by xchristina /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I wonder if we're going to start seeing EM products in our ipsy bags now.
I read a few comments on youtube yesterday and I think someone said she was deleting some of the negative comments.Just by looking at comments on Michelle's fan page on facebook, it seems like a lot of people are disappointed in the price points, which was to be expected.
Interesting, most of the negative comments I found were from recently today, and then as I kept scrolling there weren't anymore, and I thought it was really odd that there was just one concentrated group of them. Its always a shame when people/companies do that.Originally Posted by bonita22 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I read a few comments on youtube yesterday and I think someone said she was deleting some of the negative comments.
I know I would love to see EM products in the Ipsy bags. I can't justify spending that much money on her stuff. I have a $100 budget each month for all of my spending be it cosmetics, clothes, subscriptions, etc and out of that $100 $40 of it goes to Ipsy and $10 to Birchbox (I just cancelled my Beauty Army account despite liking BA). So that leaves me $50 each month and so I have to be very careful with what I buy now. So yup I'd love to see EM in Ipsy.Originally Posted by xchristina /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I wonder if we're going to start seeing EM products in our ipsy bags now.
Enter your email address to join: