@@Ambrosiakat
She started deleting all the derogatory comments on her page after a few days. It looks a lot better now than it did, though there is still some negativity from time to time. Our earlier commentary about her page was back when the drama was just starting, before BV started trying to do damage control.
You're welcome to be angry about whatever you'd like to be angry about, whether it be BlueVelveteen or why grass is green instead of purple, it's totally up to you.
I think at this point people are thinking they're toppling a giant heirarchy of a company like Birchbox, when BV is a short-staffed start up. The owner of BV admitted she made a mistake and was essentially crucified for it. There was backlash and there was a LOT of it from both bloggers and regular subscribers. Where did she say she saw nothing wrong with giving out the padded boxes?
There are two sides to every story and there will always be sympathizers along with agressors. I do completely agree that people felt misled based on the unboxings and reviews they saw, and I also agree that BV could have handled themselves better. I also think that sometimes we forget that we're talking to a human when we shoot off a CS e-mail or post on a FB page. As far as BV not responding goes, considering how much attention the box initially got then the mass influx of cancellation e-mails and I'm sure there's some not-so-nice ones in there, she probably got backlogged.
She started deleting all the derogatory comments on her page after a few days. It looks a lot better now than it did, though there is still some negativity from time to time. Our earlier commentary about her page was back when the drama was just starting, before BV started trying to do damage control.
You're welcome to be angry about whatever you'd like to be angry about, whether it be BlueVelveteen or why grass is green instead of purple, it's totally up to you.
I think at this point people are thinking they're toppling a giant heirarchy of a company like Birchbox, when BV is a short-staffed start up. The owner of BV admitted she made a mistake and was essentially crucified for it. There was backlash and there was a LOT of it from both bloggers and regular subscribers. Where did she say she saw nothing wrong with giving out the padded boxes?
There are two sides to every story and there will always be sympathizers along with agressors. I do completely agree that people felt misled based on the unboxings and reviews they saw, and I also agree that BV could have handled themselves better. I also think that sometimes we forget that we're talking to a human when we shoot off a CS e-mail or post on a FB page. As far as BV not responding goes, considering how much attention the box initially got then the mass influx of cancellation e-mails and I'm sure there's some not-so-nice ones in there, she probably got backlogged.
Last edited by a moderator: